T.I. And Tiny’s Doll Lawsuit Mistrial Over ‘Cultural Appropriation’ – NewsyKeeda

T.I. and Tiny’s lawsuit towards L.O.L. doll maker MGA Leisure led to a mistrial Wednesday after jurors heard barred testimony accusing the toy firm of “racist cultural appropriation.”

U.S. District Courtroom Choose James V. Selna granted MGA’s movement for mistrial on the sixth day of the multimillion-dollar courtroom battle involving claims MGA stole the title, likeness, and commerce costume of the all-female group OMG Girlz began by Tameka “Tiny” Harris in 2009 and popularized on her actuality present along with her Atlanta rapper husband.

Heading into the trial in Santa Ana, California, Choose Selna dominated that T.I. and Tiny must avoid the claims of their unique Could 2021 cross-complaint that alleged MGA founder Isaac Larian engages in a “routine apply” of “utilizing his doll enterprise to misappropriate the likeness of Black feminine artists.”

In response to MGA’s mistrial movement, attorneys for T.I. and Tiny violated the ruling Tuesday after they allowed jurors to listen to “incurably prejudicial” deposition testimony from a client who testified on video that she “stopped buying” MGA’s L.O.L. Shock OMG dolls as soon as she realized the OMG Girlz weren’t affiliated with the toys.

Within the testimony, the girl stated she “didn’t wish to help an organization that steals from African People and their concepts.” She additionally acknowledged her perception that MGA’s L.O.L. Shock OMG dolls had been “stealing [the O.M.G. Girlz’s] likeness and earning money off it, [which] occurs day-after-day within the Black neighborhood.”

“Listening to the testimony was even worse than studying it within the chilly print. The prejudicial nature of this testimony accusing MGA of racist cultural appropriation can’t be understated,” attorneys for MGA wrote in Wednesday submitting. “There isn’t a unringing this bell, no method for MGA to counter the improper testimony, and no instruction the courtroom may give to treatment this drawback.”

After siding with MGA, pulling the plug on the trial, and releasing the jury, Choose Selna set a standing convention for Feb. 2 to debate beginning over.

“Variety has all the time been a key worth at MGA Leisure in each our folks and our toys. In actual fact, MGA introduced variety to the style doll class greater than 21 years in the past with the introduction of Bratz dolls. We’re upset that the trial was reduce brief however stay up for vindicating our rights within the subsequent trial,” an MGA spokesperson stated in an announcement despatched to NewsyKeeda after the mistrial ruling.

Legal professionals for T.I. and Tiny didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark Wednesday.

In her testimony final week, Tiny advised jurors she believed MGA “ripped off” the “signature” look of the OMG Girlz, the group that developed right into a trio that includes her daughter Zonnique Pullins, often called “Star,” Bahja Rodriguez, often called “Magnificence,” and Breaunna Womack, often called “Babydoll.”

She stated the group toured broadly, appeared on TV, and have become immediately recognizable for his or her brightly coloured hair, layered clothes, and exaggerated equipment.

She stated one L.O.L. Shock OMG doll particularly, named Chillax, sported a “blatant” copy of the black-and-white costume the women wore on their “All Round The World” tour.

“This doll is just too acquainted. The outfit for me is an enormous, large deal,” she testified. “I wouldn’t be right here if it wasn’t the OMG model, all of the totally different coincidences, the outfit we created. This explicit outfit was designed, created, handmade, if you’ll, for the women’ tour.”

Tiny, a member of the multi-platinum Nineties R&B group Xscape and a Grammy-winning songwriter acknowledged for her contributions to the TLC hit “No Scrubs,” testified that she and the OMG Girlz labored arduous to create their model and deserved compensation.

“I’m merely stating that this model was ripped off,” she testified.

Legal professionals for Larian and MGA disagreed. In her opening assertion final week, MGA lawyer Jennifer Keller referred to as T.I. and Tiny’s claims of infringement a “shakedown.”

“This case is about greed. That’s what it’s about,” Keller advised jurors.


“[They] need tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars} from MGA Leisure for doing completely nothing, and I do imply nothing. We’re going to indicate you that the OMG Girlz truly copied us, and now complain we appear like them,” she stated. “They had been development followers, not development setters.”

In response to Keller, MGA marketed dolls in its wildly well-liked Bratz line again in 2005 that had been styled as musicians with the identical brilliant pink, purple, and blue hair claimed by the OMG Girlz. She stated even the lady group’s title was by-product, contemplating the “z” on the finish just like Bratz.

Leave a Comment